Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Oregon Railroad & Navigation Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. F. V. Martin, as Sole Surviving Partner, etc., 1913 — 229 U.S. 606 · caselaw · US
General
The Oregon Railroad & Navigation Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. F. V. Martin, as Sole Surviving Partner, etc.
229 U.S. 606·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 281.
The Oregon Railroad & Navigation Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. F. V. Martin, as Sole Surviving Partner, etc.
In error to the Supreme Court' of the State of Oregon.
Submitted for the plaintiff in error, May 2, 1913.
Decided May 5, 1913.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment reversed with costs on the authority of C., R. I. &c. Ry. Co. v. Hardwick Elevator Co., 226 U. S. 426, and cause remanded for further • proceedings.
Mr. Maxwell Evarts and Mr. W. W. -Cotton for the plaintiff in error.
No appearance for the defendant in error.