Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Klutznick, Secretary of Commerce, et al. v. Shapiro, Essex County Executive, 1980 — 449 U.S. 1058 · caselaw · US
General
Klutznick, Secretary of Commerce, et al. v. Shapiro, Essex County Executive
449 U.S. 1058·Supreme Court of the United States·1980
Justice Stewart and Justice Stevens dissent.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. A-490.
Klutznick, Secretary of Commerce, et al. v. Shapiro, Essex County Executive.
[MAJORITY]
D. C. N. J. The order entered December 4, 1980, by Justice Brennan is continued pending the timely filing and final disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari.
Justice Stewart and Justice Stevens dissent.