Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al., petitioners, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., 2014 — 134 S. Ct. 2900 · caselaw · US
Tax
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al., petitioners, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
134 S. Ct. 2900189 L. Ed. 2d 854·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al., petitioners,
v.
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
No. 13-553.
Supreme Court of the United States
July 1, 2014.
Case below, 720 F.3d 863.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether, in resolving a claim of unlawful tax discrimination under 49 U.S.C. § 11501(b)(4), a court should consider other aspects of the State's tax scheme rather than focusing solely on the challenged tax provision.