Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Max Bachman, Respondent, v. Charles H. Harrington, as President of Rochester Musicians' Protective Association, Appellant, 1905 — 183 N.Y. 536 · caselaw · US
General
Max Bachman, Respondent, v. Charles H. Harrington, as President of Rochester Musicians' Protective Association, Appellant
183 N.Y. 536·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Max Bachman, Respondent, v. Charles H. Harrington, as President of Rochester Musicians’ Protective Association, Appellant.
(Argued November 22, 1905;
decided November 28, 1905.)
Bachman v. Harrington, 108 App. Div. 357, appeal dismissed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the . Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 11, 1905, which affirmed an order of Special Term adjudging the defendant guilty of contempt of court.
George D. Forsyth for appellant.
Hugh J. O'Brien for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, witlneosts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gbay, O’Bbien, Baetlett, Haight, Vann and Weeneb, JJ.