Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James v. Illinois, 1981 — 451 U.S. 1014 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
James v. Illinois
451 U.S. 1014·Supreme Court of the United States·1981
Justice Stewart, Justice Powell, and Justice Rehnquist dissent. Justice Blackmun dissents and would deny certiorari.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 80-5799.
James v. Illinois.
[MAJORITY]
App. Ct. Ill., 4th Dist. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Edwards v. Arizona, ante, p. 477.
Justice Stewart, Justice Powell, and Justice Rehnquist dissent. Justice Blackmun dissents and would deny certiorari.