Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General Electric Co. et al. v. Washington, 1954 — 347 U.S. 909 · caselaw · US
General
General Electric Co. et al. v. Washington
347 U.S. 90998 L. Ed. 2d 1066·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 335.
General Electric Co. et al. v. Washington.
Argued February 2, 1954.
Decided February 8, 1954.
Max Isenbergh argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Holland and F. Gerald Toye.
Jennings P. Felix, Assistant Attorney General of Washington, argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Don Eastvold, Attorney General, and E. P. Donnelly.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment is reversed. Carson v. Roane-Anderson Co., 342 U. S. 232.