Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Trans World Airlines, Inc., v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., et al.; and Eastern Air Lines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al., 1960 — 362 U.S. 969 · caselaw · US
General
Trans World Airlines, Inc., v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., et al.; and Eastern Air Lines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al.
362 U.S. 969·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 679.
No. 777.
Trans World Airlines, Inc., v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., et al.; and Eastern Air Lines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al.
Charles Pickett and Warren E. Baker for petitioner in No. 679.
E. Smythe Gambrell, W. Glen Harlan and Harold L. Russell for petitioner in No. 777. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Franklin M. Stone and O. D. Ozment for the Civil Aeronautics Board.
Robert E. Redding and Dick L. Lansden for the City of Nashville et al., Dorothy F. Fardon for the City of Kansas City, Missouri, and Aloys P. Kaufmann and Thomas J. Neenan for the City of St. Louis et al., respondents, in support of the petition in No. 679. Joseph J. O’Connell, Jr. and Robert Reed Gray for Delta Air Lines, Inc., Howard C. Westwood and Peter S. Craig for American Airlines, Inc., and Richard A. Fitzgerald for National Airlines, Inc., in opposition to the petitions for certiorari.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 107 U. S. App. D. C. 174, 275 F. 2d 632: