Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al.; Michigan v. Illinois et al.; and New York v. Illinois et al., 1980 — 449 U.S. 812 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al.; Michigan v. Illinois et al.; and New York v. Illinois et al.
449 U.S. 812·Supreme Court of the United States·1980
Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these orders.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1,
No. 2,
No. 3,
Orig.
Orig.
Orig.
Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al.; Michigan v. Illinois et al.; and New York v. Illinois et al.
[For earlier order herein, see, e. g., 441 U. S. 921.]
[MAJORITY]
Report of the Special Master received and ordered filed. Exceptions, if any, to the report may be filed within 14 days. Replies, if any, to the exceptions may be filed within seven days. Report of the Special Master with respect to costs received and ordered filed.
Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these orders.