Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John M. WALSH et al., Appellants, v. BANK OF LASSEN COUNTY et al., Appellees; PATRICK WALSH & SONS, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Mary C. HILL et al., Appellees, 1930 — 41 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
General
John M. WALSH et al., Appellants, v. BANK OF LASSEN COUNTY et al., Appellees; PATRICK WALSH & SONS, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Mary C. HILL et al., Appellees
41 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John M. WALSH et al., Appellants, v. BANK OF LASSEN COUNTY et al., Appellees. PATRICK WALSH & SONS, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Mary C. HILL et al., Appellees.
Nos. 6074, 6075.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 5, 1930.
Before BUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to stipulations of counsel for the respective parties, ordered appeals dismissed.