General
Malone Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States et al.
344 U.S. 925·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 505.
Malone Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States et al.
James W. Wrape, W. H. Brantley, Jr. and Glenn M. Elliott for appellant.
Acting Solicitor General Stern and Edward M. Reidy for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and Peyton D. Bibb, Reuben G. Crimm, Allan Watkins and Edgar Watkins for Akers Motor Lines, Inc. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.