Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Pitre v. Cain et al.; Gooden v. Iowa; Rooney v. Georgia; LaRue v. Denso Manufacturing Arkansas, Inc.; Banks v. Florida; Earhart v. Konteh, Warden; Pendleton v. United States Medical Center, Springfield, Missouri, et al.; Richardson v. McHugh, Secretary of the Army; Samson v. Manley et al.; Veasaw v. United States et al.; Campos v. Conway, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility; Bittan v. Hawaii Department of Human Services; Hogan v. Florida; Jones v. Burns; Clark v. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security; Moore v. United States; Brown v. City of North Chicago, Illinois, et al.; Soentgen v. Pennsylvania; Elam v. Texas; Sheehan v. Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, In re Lucious, Settle v. Bell, Warden; Coulombe v. City of Oxnard, California, et al., 2010 — 562 U.S. 1103 · caselaw · US