Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anderson et al. v. United States, 1942 — 316 U.S. 651 · caselaw · US
General
Anderson et al. v. United States
316 U.S. 651·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 852.
Anderson et al. v. United States.
April 6, 1942.
Messrs. W. H. Norvell and Lee Pressman for petitioners. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Oscar A. Provost and Archibald Cox for the United States. Briefs of amici curiae were filed by Mr. Abraham J. Isserman on behalf of the National Federation for Constitutional Liberties, and by Mr. Arthur Garfield Hays on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union, in support of petitioners.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.