Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NORTH CAROLINA, et al., applicants, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF the NAACP, et al., 2016 — 137 S. Ct. 27 · caselaw · US
General
NORTH CAROLINA, et al., applicants, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF the NAACP, et al.
137 S. Ct. 27195 L. Ed. 2d 900·Supreme Court of the United States·2016
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NORTH CAROLINA, et al., applicants,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF the NAACP, et al.
No. 16A168.
Supreme Court of the United States
Aug. 31, 2016.
Application to recall and stay mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court denied.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Justice KENNEDY, and Justice ALITO would grant the stay, except with respect to the preregistration provision. Justice THOMAS would grant the stay in its entirety.