Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Central National Bank of Boston et al., Appellants, v. Aaron R. Stevens et al., Respondents, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 687 · caselaw · US
General
The Central National Bank of Boston et al., Appellants, v. Aaron R. Stevens et al., Respondents
156 N.Y. 687·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Central National Bank of Boston et al., Appellants, v. Aaron R. Stevens et al., Respondents.
(Submitted June 13, 1898;
decided June 14, 1898.)
[MAJORITY]
Motion to amend remittitur. (See 144 N. Y. 50.)
Ordered: That the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States in this case be annexed to the remittitur herein and the proceedings thereupon be remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of New York to proceed upon the said remittitur and to render judgment herein in conformity to the said mandate and opinions referred to therein, without costs in this court.