Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Maryanna Huda, as Administratrix, etc., of Valentine Huda, Deceased, Appellant, v. The American Glucose Company, Respondent, 1897 — 152 N.Y. 629 · caselaw · US
General
Maryanna Huda, as Administratrix, etc., of Valentine Huda, Deceased, Appellant, v. The American Glucose Company, Respondent
152 N.Y. 629·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Maryanna Huda, as Administratrix, etc., of Valentine Huda, Deceased, Appellant, v. The American Glucose Company, Respondent.
(Argued March 1, 1897;
decided March 9, 1897.)
Motion to set aside order dismissing the appieal heretofore taken herein (see 151 N. Y. 549) and place on the calendar as a preferred cause, upon the ground that the Appellate Division has since certified that in its opinion a question of law is involved which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals.
Le Roy Parker for motion.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted.