General
George Burt, Respondent, v. Arnold Lustig, Appellant
137 N.Y. 538·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George Burt, Respondent, v. Arnold Lustig, Appellant.
(Argued December 23, 1892;
decided January 17, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, entered upon an order made January 16, 1892, which overruled defendant’s exceptions, denied his motion for a new trial and directed judgment to he entered in favor of plaintiff upon a verdict directed by the court.
John C. Shaw for appellant.
Joseph F. Mosher for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.