IP
Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.; Genco, Inc. v. Ace Patents Corp.; and Chicago Coin Machine Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.
314 U.S. 705·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 154.
No. 155.
No. 156.
Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.; Genco, Inc. v. Ace Patents Corp.; and Chicago Coin Machine Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.
November 10, 1941.
Messrs. Clarence E. Threedy and John H. Sutherland for petitioners. Messrs. Casper W. Ooms and John A. Russell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
The petition for rehearing is granted. The orders denying certiorari, ante, p. 637, are vacated and the petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is granted. Reported below: 119 F. 2d 349.