Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Grimes v. Miller et al., 1977 — 434 U.S. 978 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Grimes v. Miller et al.
434 U.S. 978·Supreme Court of the United States·1977
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
December 5, 1977
No. 77-5321.
Grimes v. Miller et al.
Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date, with the exception of No. 76-1200, Crist, Warden, et al. v. Cline et al., infra, p. 980.
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. M. D. N. C.