Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William A. C. Matthie, Appellant, v. Charles R. Arents, as General Manager and Attorney in Fact for John Gibb et al., Underwriters of the Tradesmen's Fire Lloyds of the City of New York, Respondent, 1903 — 174 N.Y. 543 · caselaw · US
General
William A. C. Matthie, Appellant, v. Charles R. Arents, as General Manager and Attorney in Fact for John Gibb et al., Underwriters of the Tradesmen's Fire Lloyds of the City of New York, Respondent
174 N.Y. 543·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William A. C. Matthie, Appellant, v. Charles R. Arents, as General Manager and Attorney in Fact for John Gibb et al., Underwriters of the Tradesmen’s Fire Lloyds of the City of New York, Respondent.
Matilde -v. Arents, 68 App. Div. 645, affirmed.
(Argued March 27, 1908;
decided April 28, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 4, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
William B. Ellison and Duncan A. MacIntyre for appellant.
Frederic B. Ooudert, Jr., and John P. Murray for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Guriam.]
Per Guriam.
The material facts in this case are similar to those in that of the same plaintiff against the Globe Fire Insurance Company, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion therein, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed, with costs.
Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight and Vann, JJ., concur; Martin, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.