Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The North British and Mercantile Insurance Company of London and Edinburgh, Appellant, v. The Central Vermont Railroad Company et al., Respondents, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 726 · caselaw · US
General
The North British and Mercantile Insurance Company of London and Edinburgh, Appellant, v. The Central Vermont Railroad Company et al., Respondents
158 N.Y. 726·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The North British and Mercantile Insurance Company of London and Edinburgh, Appellant, v. The Central Vermont Railroad Company et al., Respondents.
(Argued March 10, 1899;
decided March 24, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 22, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of the defendants entered upon the report of a referee.
North British & Mer. Ins. Co. v. C. V. R. R. Co., 9 App. Div. 4, affirmed.
Lawrence Russell for appellant.
Louis Hasbrouck for respondents. ■
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.