General
Oswald, Administrator, versus the State of New-York
2 U.S. 4152 Dall. 415·Supreme Court of the United States·1793
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
February Term, 1793.
Oswald, Administrator, versus the State of New-York.
PROCLAMATION was made in this Ujjufe, “ that any perfon. having authority to appear for the State of New-Tori is required to appear accordingly j’? and noperfon appearing it was ordered, on motion of Cone for the Plaintiff,
[MAJORITY — By the Court]
By the Court
:—Unlefs the State appears by the firft day of next Term to the above fuit, or iliew caufe to the contrary, judgment will be entered by default againft the faid ftate.
S-ee ant. p.401 and alfo post. Cbifholm, executor, verfifs Georgia. Cutting, adtniniftrator, verfus South Carolina. Grayfoa verfus Virginia.