General
Cornelius W. H. Elting, Respondent, v. Charles W. Dayton, Appellant
144 N.Y. 644·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Cornelius W. H. Elting, Respondent, v. Charles W. Dayton, Appellant.
(Argued November 26, 1894;
decided December 11, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made June 15, 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion hy the defendant to strike out a portion of plaintiff’s reply.
Charles E. Patterson for appellant.
John J. Emson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
AH concur.
Order affirmed.