General

C. William Loring, Respondent, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, Appellant; Lucy A. Clark, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Sarah A. Whitman, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant

94 N.Y. 638·New York Court of Appeals·1883·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

C. William Loring, Respondent, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, Appellant. Lucy A. Clark, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant. Sarah A. Whitman, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant. [MAJORITY] These cases presented the same question, and were argued and decided with Clark v. L. S. & M. S. R. Co. (ante, p. 217).