Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DIXIE STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN PITCH PINE EXPORT COMPANY et al., Appellees, 1932 — 55 F.2d 1077 · caselaw · US
General
DIXIE STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN PITCH PINE EXPORT COMPANY et al., Appellees
55 F.2d 1077·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DIXIE STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN PITCH PINE EXPORT COMPANY et al., Appellees.
No. 6523.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 10, 1932.
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In the above numbered and entitled cause come the appellees, American Pitch Pine Export Company and American Hardwood Exporters, Ine., through their counsel, Messrs. Spencer, Gidiere, Phelps & Dunbar, and confess that, in the record) and proceedings had before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, there is reversible error.
Because of said error so confessed, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the said District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana in said cause be, and the same is, reversed, and that said canse he, and it is hereby, remanded to the said District Court with instructions to dissolve the injunction pendente lite and to dismiss the petition and intervening petition for want of jurisdiction, at the cost of the appellees.
It is further ordered that the mandate of this court issue without delay.