Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Air Line Pilots Association, International, v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al., 1948 — 335 U.S. 816 · caselaw · US
General
Air Line Pilots Association, International, v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al.
335 U.S. 816·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 86.
Air Line Pilots Association, International, v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al.
Henry Kaiser, Oerhard P. Van Arkel, Daniel D. Carmell and Samuel H. Jaffee for petitioner.
Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Bergson, Charles H. Weston and Emory T. Nunneley, Jr. for the Civil Aeronautics Board; and John W. Cross, Mac Asbill and Richard A. Fitzgerald for the National Airlines, Inc., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.