Tax
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Bowers, Tax Commissioner of Ohio; United States Plywood Corp. v. City of Algoma
358 U.S. 861·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 9.
No. 44.
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Bowers, Tax Commissioner of Ohio. United States Plywood Corp. v. City of Algoma.
Edwin Larkin for movant-respondent in No. 44. Bruce Bromley and Roswell Magill, as amici curiae, were on a reply to the motion to strike.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Ohio (probable jurisdiction noted, 355 U. S. 911); and
Certiorari, 356 U. S. 957, to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin. The motion of the City of Algoma to strike brief, as amici curiae, of Bruce Bromley et al., is denied.
Reported below: No. 9, 166 Ohio St. 122, 140 N. E. 2d 313; No. 44, 2 Wis. 2d 567, 87 N. W. 2d 481.