General
GREYHOUND LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al.
389 U.S. 216·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GREYHOUND LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 555.
Decided December 4, 1967.
Amos Mathews and Robert J. Bernard for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., and John L. Arrington, Jr., for Missouri, Kansas & Oklahoma Coach Lines, appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam. Mr. Justice Douglas]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Douglas
is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.