Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. ADAMS COUNTY et al., Appellees and Cross-Appellants, 1933 — 63 F.2d 1012 · caselaw · US
Corporations
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. ADAMS COUNTY et al., Appellees and Cross-Appellants
63 F.2d 1012·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. ADAMS COUNTY et al., Appellees and Cross-Appellants.
No. 7120.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 23, 1933.
L. B. Da Ponte, of Seattle, Wash., for appellant and cross-appellee.
John A. Homer, Asst. Atty. Gen., for all appellees and cross-appellants except King, Benton and Yakima Counties.
Robert M. Burgunder, of Seattle, Wash., for King County.
Charles L. Powell, of Kennewick, Wash., for Benton County.
O. Sandvig, of Yakima, Wash., for Yakima County.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal and cross-appeal (1 F. Supp. 163) dismissed without costs to either party; mandate forthwith.