General
Johanna Frank, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Ira L. Otis et al., Appellants
113 N.Y. 654·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Johanna Frank, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Ira L. Otis et al., Appellants.
(Argued April 15, 1889;
decided May 3, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme ’’Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made April 14, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of • plaintiff, entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion . for a new trial.
Edward Harris for appellants.
C. D. Kiehel for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Finch and Gray, JJ., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.