Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Asa L. Rogers, as Assignee of The Rogers Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. Charles E. Pell et al., Respondents, 1897 — 152 N.Y. 643 · caselaw · US
General
Asa L. Rogers, as Assignee of The Rogers Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. Charles E. Pell et al., Respondents
152 N.Y. 643·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Asa L. Rogers, as Assignee of The Rogers Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. Charles E. Pell et al., Respondents.
Reported below, 89 Hun, 159.
(Argued March 15, 1897;
decided March 23, 1897.)
Motion to dismiss an aq>peal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 19, 1895, which dismissed plaintiff’s complaint on exceptions ordered to "be heard in the first instance at General Terra.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal wras not perfected within one year after the entry of the judgment.
Cannon & Atwater for motion.
Stedman & Larkin opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, provided within ten days undertaking is served and appellant pays ten dollars costs, and, in default, motion granted.