Contracts · MBE-tested
LAMPTON et al. v. BONIN et al.
397 U.S. 66325 L. Ed. 2d 644·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Black dissent for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Black’s dissenting opinion in Rosado v. Wyman, ante, p. 430.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LAMPTON et al. v. BONIN et al.
No. 1112,
Misc.
Decided April 27, 1970
Jeffrey B. Schwartz and Richard S. Buckley for appellants.
Jack P. F. Oremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and William P. Schuler and Dorothy D. Wolbrette, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted and the judgment of the United States District Court is vacated. The case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Rosado v. Wyman, ante, p. 397.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Black dissent for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Black’s dissenting opinion in Rosado v. Wyman, ante, p. 430.