Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank S. Atwell, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Charles K. Brown, Survivor, etc., Appellant, 1875 — 59 N.Y. 655 · caselaw · US
IP
Frank S. Atwell, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Charles K. Brown, Survivor, etc., Appellant
59 N.Y. 655·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank S. Atwell, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Charles K. Brown, Survivor, etc., Appellant.
(Argued November 20, 1874;
decided January 19, 1875.)
This was an action brought to recover the proceeds of alleged sales made by defendant, of rights under letters patent of which plaintiff’s testator claimed to be the owner. The principal points arose upon exceptions to the findings of the referee, and to his conclusions based upon the findings, and were disposed of upon the facts.
John B. Gale for the appellant.
A. K. Hadley for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Folger, J.,]
Folger, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Jndgment affirmed.