Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ginzburg et al. v. United States, 1965 — 380 U.S. 961 · caselaw · US
General
Ginzburg et al. v. United States
380 U.S. 961·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 807.
Ginzburg et al. v. United States.
David I. Shapiro and Sidney Dickstein for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States. Melvin L. Wulf for the American Civil Liberties Union et al.; Edward de Grazia for Boyle et al. ; Irwin Karp for the Authors League of America, Inc.; and Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein for Serett, as amici curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of Lillian Maxine Serett for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Certiorari granted;