General
Edward W. Shoesmith, Appellant, v. H. Meyer Boot and Shoe Manufacturing Company et al.
198 U.S. 582·Supreme Court of the United States·1905
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 588.
Edward W. Shoesmith, Appellant, v. H. Meyer Boot and Shoe Manufacturing Company et al.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
Motion to dismiss submitted May 15, 1905.
Decided May 29, 1905.
Mr. William R. Payne for appellant.
Mr. Gwynn Garnett for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U. S. 324; United States v. Jahn, 155 U. S. 109, 113; Louisville Trust Company v. Knott, 191 U. S. 225, 232.