Corporations
R. A. LOOMIS, Jr., et ux., Plaintiffs in Error, v. GULF OIL CORPORATION et al., Defendants in Error
123 S.W.2d 505·Texas Courts of Civil Appeals·1938·TX
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
R. A. LOOMIS, Jr., et ux., Plaintiffs in Error, v. GULF OIL CORPORATION et al., Defendants in Error.
No. 1861.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.
Dec. 16, 1938.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 13, 1939.
Locke, Locke, Stroud & Randolph, of Dallas, for plaintiffs in error.
Joe S. 'Brown and John Broughton, both of Houston, for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — GRISSOM, Justice.]
GRISSOM, Justice.
This is a companion case to that of R. W. Loomis v. Gulf Oil Corporation, 123 S.W.2d 501, this day decided by this court in an opinion by Chief Justice Leslie. The parties to the instant suit are R. A. Loomis, Jr., and wife, Mrs. Lula May Loomis, -as plaintiffs, and Gulf Oil Corporation and Gulf Refining Company, as defendants. With the exception of a difference in parties, the cases are substantially and in most respects exactly the same. With the exception noted, the pleadings, evidence, judgment and questions of law on appeal are the same as in the companion case.
The opinion in the case referred to is adopted as our opinion in this case.
The judgment is affirmed.