General

Mann's Boudoir Car Company, Respondent, v. William Shaw, Receiver, etc., Appellant

141 N.Y. 571·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Mann’s Boudoir Car Company, Respondent, v. William Shaw, Receiver, etc., Appellant. (Argued January 18, 1894; decided February 6, 1894.) Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made May 12, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee. Cha/rles E. Patterson for appellant. G. W. Ootterill for respondent. [MAJORITY] Agree to affirm on opinion below. All concur, except Finch and Beckham, JJ., dissenting, and Andrews, Ch. J., not voting. Judgment affirmed. 69 Hun, 345.