Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Northern Central Railway Company v. Hering, Comptroller, 1902 — 186 U.S. 480 · caselaw · US
General
Northern Central Railway Company v. Hering, Comptroller
186 U.S. 480·Supreme Court of the United States·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 314.
Northern Central Railway Company v. Hering, Comptroller.
Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Maryland. Motions to dismiss or affirm.
Submitted April 28, 1902.
Decided May 5, 1902.
Mr: lsidor Rayner and Mr. A. S. Worthington for the motions. Mr. John J. Donaldson, Mr. Wayne Me Veagh and Mr. Frederic D. McKenney opposing.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authority of New Orleans Water Works Company v. Louisiana State; Wisconsin v. Commissioners, and cases cited, 183 U. S. 693 ; California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 393.