Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Spevack v. Strauss et al., 1958 — 358 U.S. 871 · caselaw · US
General
Spevack v. Strauss et al.
358 U.S. 871·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 339.
Spevack v. Strauss et al.
Carleton U. Edwards, II, Joseph Y. Houghton and Bernard Margolius for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Samuel D. Slade, Herman Marcuse, Loren K. Olson and Roland A. Anderson for respondents. Briefs of amici curiae in support of the petition for a writ of certiorari were filed by Elisha Hanson, Arthur B. Hanson and Calvin H. Cobh, Jr. for the American Chemical Society, and Carlton S. Dargusch and Carlton S. Dar-gusch, Jr. for the Engineers Joint Council, Inc.
[MAJORITY]
The motion for discovery in this case is denied. The motion for leave to use record in No. 641, October Term, 1957, and the motion to impound the record are granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit also granted.