Contracts · MBE-tested
Eugene FLETCHER, Appellant, v. CITY OF PASADENA, a Municipal Corporation, et al., Appellees
68 F.2d 1002·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eugene FLETCHER, Appellant, v. CITY OF PASADENA, a Municipal Corporation, et al., Appellees.
No. 7159.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 16, 1934.
E. D. Martindale, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Harold P. Huís, City Atty., and John W. Holmes, Deputy City Atty., both of Pasadena, Cal., for appellees City of Pasadena, Kelly and Morris.
U. S. Webb, Atty. Gen., and Lucas E. Kil-kenny, Dep. Atty. Gen., for appellees Webster, Reynolds, and Jacobs.
Everett W. Mattoon, Co. Counsel, and S. V. O. Prichard, Deputy Co. Counsel, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees Steel and Gould.
W. I. Gilbert, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Ingram.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRE CHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon motions of counsel for appellees for dismissal of appeals, and, upon consideration thereof, ordered motions to dismiss granted for failure of appellant to pay docket fee as required by rule 17 of the Rules of Practice of this court, and because of incapacity of appellant to prosecute the cause.