Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hanson, Executrix, et al. v. Denckla et al., 1957 — 354 U.S. 919 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Hanson, Executrix, et al. v. Denckla et al.
354 U.S. 919·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 918.
Hanson, Executrix, et al. v. Denckla et al.
Wil- Ham H. Foulk and Manley P. Caldwell for appellants. D. H. Redfearn, C. Robert Burns, R. H. Ferrell, Sol A. Rosenblatt and Charles Roden for appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Florida. Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction is postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.