Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James F. KERNAN, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Ridge Manufacturing Co., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Maurice CAMPBELL, Federal Prohibition Administrator for the Second District of New York, and James M. Doran, Federal Prohibition Commissioner of the United States, Defendants-Appellees, 1929 — 36 F.2d 779 · caselaw · US
General
James F. KERNAN, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Ridge Manufacturing Co., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Maurice CAMPBELL, Federal Prohibition Administrator for the Second District of New York, and James M. Doran, Federal Prohibition Commissioner of the United States, Defendants-Appellees
36 F.2d 779·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James F. KERNAN, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Ridge Manufacturing Co., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Maurice CAMPBELL, Federal Prohibition Administrator for the Second District of New York, and James M. Doran, Federal Prohibition Commissioner of the United States, Defendants-Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 2, 1929.
No. 96.
Lewis Landes, of New York City, for appellant.
Howard W. Ameli, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Herbert H. Kellogg, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y., John E. O’Neill, Senior Atty., Bureau of Prohibition, of New York City, and John H. McEvers, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for appellees.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order [36 F.(2d) 778] affirmed.