Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Graziano v. New York, 1961 — 365 U.S. 854 · caselaw · US
General
Graziano v. New York
365 U.S. 854·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 20,
Misc.
Graziano v. New York.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Nathan Kestnbaum for petitioner.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and George K. Bernstein and Jean R. McCoy, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.