Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Kendra ESPINOZA, et al., petitioners, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al., 2019 — 139 S. Ct. 2777 · caselaw · US
General
Kendra ESPINOZA, et al., petitioners, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al.
139 S. Ct. 2777204 L. Ed. 2d 1157·Supreme Court of the United States·2019
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Kendra ESPINOZA, et al., petitioners,
v.
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al.
No. 18-1195.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 28, 2019.
Motion of The Cato Institute for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of Liberty Justice Center, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Georgia Goal Scholarship Program, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of Pioneer Institute, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana granted.