Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
R. A. JEANNERET, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., 1930 — 38 F.2d 1015 · caselaw · US
Tax
R. A. JEANNERET, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.
38 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
R. A. JEANNERET, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.
No. 7675.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Feb. 14, 1930.
E. R. Morrison, of Joplin, Mo., for plaintiff in error.
T. M. Dillard, of Topeka, Kan., and I, N. Watson and R. E. Watson, both of Kansas City, Mo., for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error dismissed at costs of plaintiff in error, but without the taxation of attorney fee, per stipulation of parties.