Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Elizabeth Ring, Respondent, v. Eugene B. Howell, as Receiver of the Long Island Real Estate, Exchange and Investment Company, Appellant, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 553 · caselaw · US
General
Elizabeth Ring, Respondent, v. Eugene B. Howell, as Receiver of the Long Island Real Estate, Exchange and Investment Company, Appellant
184 N.Y. 553·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elizabeth Ring, Respondent, v. Eugene B. Howell, as Receiver of the Long Island Real Estate, Exchange and Investment Company, Appellant.
Ring v. Long Island Real Estate, Exchange & Ins. Co., 93 App. Div. 442, affirmed.
(Argued February 13, 1906;
decided February 27, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 19, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the Kings County Court- on trial without a jury.
Robert H. Wilson for appellant.
James C. Gropsey and Franh Mann for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yaw and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, J. ...