Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of Henry Zink et al., Respondents, to Remove Joseph Bohn et al., Appellants, from Certain Premises, 1889 — 117 N.Y. 632 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Petition of Henry Zink et al., Respondents, to Remove Joseph Bohn et al., Appellants, from Certain Premises
117 N.Y. 632·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of Henry Zink et al., Respondents, to Remove Joseph Bohn et al., Appellants, from Certain Premises.
(Argued October 8, 1889;
decided October 29, 1889.)
Motion to dismiss appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Superior. Court of the city of Buffalo, entered upon an order made December 1, 1888, which affirmed a judgment and order of the Municipal Court of Buffalo in favor of the petitioners.
O. C. De Witt for motion.
E. L. Parker opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to grant motion; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.