Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ohio ex rel. Thompson v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 1942 — 315 U.S. 782 · caselaw · US
General
Ohio ex rel. Thompson v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
315 U.S. 782·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 898.
Ohio ex rel. Thompson v. Industrial Commission of Ohio.
February 9, 1942.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. Live Oak Water Users’ Association v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354, 358-59; Ohio ex rel. Squire v. Brown, 312 U. S. 652.
Mr. Paul V. Connolly for appellant. Mr. Thomas J. Herbert, Attorney General of Ohio, for appellee.