Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lester J. GENDRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee, 1975 — 524 F.2d 1154 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Lester J. GENDRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
524 F.2d 1154·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1975
Before BARNES and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and CARR, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lester J. GENDRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 74-2628.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 22, 1975.
Lester J. Gendron (in pro per.) Gendron & Gendron, Madera, Cal. (argued), for plaintiff-appellant.
Lawrence Shearer, Atty. (argued), Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellee.
The Honoiable Charles H. Carr, Senior Judge of the Central District of California, sitting by designation.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
OPINION
Before BARNES and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and CARR, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff sues the government to quiet title to certain property claimed by him, which has been administered by the United States as National Forest Land for over 70 years.
We affirm the summary judgment of dismissal with prejudice entered under Rules 12(c) and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by the District Court.
We adopt as our opinion the excellent opinion of the District Court entitled Gendron v. United States of America, entered May 28, 1974, as it appears in 402 F.Supp. 46.
Affirmed.