General
Jennie Hope, Respondent v. The Troy and Lansingburgh Railroad Company, Appellant
110 N.Y. 643·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jennie Hope, Respondent v. The Troy and Lansingburgh Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued June 13, 1888;
decided June 29, 1888.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made at the May Term, 1886, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict and affirming an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Edgar L. Fursman for appellant.
J. F. Crawford for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Earl and Finch, JJ., who dissent on the ground of the exclusion of the evidence of the two physicians, offered by defendant, and Peckham, J., who takes no part.
Judgment affirmed.