Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Laura A. Weiant, Respondent, v. The Rockland Lake Trap Rock Company et al., Appellants, 1902 — 172 N.Y. 600 · caselaw · US
General
Laura A. Weiant, Respondent, v. The Rockland Lake Trap Rock Company et al., Appellants
172 N.Y. 600·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Laura A. Weiant, Respondent, v. The Rockland Lake Trap Rock Company et al., Appellants.
Weiant v. Rockland Lake Trap Rock Co., 61 App. Div. 383, appeal dismissed.
(Argued October 6, 1902;
decided October 14, 1902.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 8, 1901, affirming an order of Special Term which denied a motion to vacate and set aside a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal is unauthorized and the Court of Appeals without jurisdiction to entertain it.
William MeOauley for motion.
Wilson Brown, Jr., opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs.